--- Log opened Wed Jun 04 00:00:45 2014
00:20 < qard> Ah, what I needed to do was create an ObjectTemplate and use SetInternalFieldCount to make space for the internal fields. It seems V8 on 0.10 lets you add internal fields even if you haven't declared space for them, but they disappear later. 0.11 blows up when you build, which is a lot more helpful.
00:46 <@indutny> tjfontaine: heya
00:46 <@indutny> tjfontaine: in ny right now
00:46 <@indutny> will be in SF tomorrow
02:26 -!- mode/#libuv [+o TooTallNate] by ChanServ
03:19 -!- mode/#libuv [+o piscisaureus] by ChanServ
03:21 -!- mode/#libuv [+o piscisaureus_] by ChanServ
04:27 -!- mode/#libuv [+o piscisaureus] by ChanServ
04:30 -!- mode/#libuv [+o TooTallNate] by ChanServ
10:32 -!- mode/#libuv [+o piscisaureus] by ChanServ
10:34 -!- mode/#libuv [+o piscisaureus] by ChanServ
14:02 < loyd> So, > Hi guys. It's ok to use assert in https://github.com/joyent/libuv/blob/master/src/unix/loop.c#L93 ?
16:23 < bradleymeck> tjfontaine: people at JSConf were pretty reliable (IE and FF team) that if we want a unified debugger protocol, it has to be built from the ground up, I think that is out of scope for now
16:23 <@tjfontaine> yay for standards -- hopefully somethign good can come of it
16:24 < bradleymeck> they all hate eachother
16:24 < bradleymeck> in the nicest phrasings possible
16:24 <@tjfontaine> haha
16:25 <@tjfontaine> what seems more likely is just trying to pick a winner and then using mass adoption to force its usage on others
16:28 < bradleymeck> FF team has an internal project to get Chrome’s protocol, which is a sibling to Safari’s. IE is a big fat F U to integrations
16:28 < bradleymeck> but FF team said it will never get 1st class support unless we somehow get 80+% adoption on the browser end
16:29 <@tjfontaine> right
17:08 -!- mode/#libuv [+o TooTallNate] by ChanServ
17:56 -!- mode/#libuv [+o sblom] by ChanServ
19:39 < trevnorris> afternoon
20:54 < Dirkson> Hey all. uv_udp_send uses a particular, seemingly random-per-program-launch port to send on. Where is that port defined? (I'd like to listen on that port)
20:56 < bradleymeck> Dirkson: did you init and bind your uv_udp_t?
20:56 < Dirkson> bradleymeck: Yes.
20:57 < bradleymeck> mmmm I would think during bind you set the port on the sockaddr
20:58 < Dirkson> bradleymeck: Curiously, that port appears to have no bearing on which port uv_udp_send uses.
21:00 < Dirkson> Wait, wait.
21:01 < Dirkson> bradleymeck: Nope, I did /not/ bind uv_udp_send's uv_udp_t. I take it I ought to be doing that?
21:01 < bradleymeck> yep
21:01 < Dirkson> bradleymeck: I suppose I can just randomize the udp port myself.
21:02 < bradleymeck> port 0 should just default to a random one
21:03 < Dirkson> bradleymeck: Hey, thanks : )
21:03 < Dirkson> bradleymeck: Yup, my code suddenly works : )
21:41 <@MI6> joyent/node: Ben Noordhuis master * 8ae32a9 : bench: fix buffers/buffer-base64-encode benchmark - http://git.io/Dwez0Q
22:13 -!- mode/#libuv [+o TooTallNate] by ChanServ
22:26 -!- mode/#libuv [+o sblom] by ChanServ
22:40 -!- mode/#libuv [+o sblom] by ChanServ
22:41 -!- mode/#libuv [+o sblom] by ChanServ
22:42 -!- mode/#libuv [+o sblom] by ChanServ
22:44 -!- mode/#libuv [+o sblom] by ChanServ
--- Log closed Thu Jun 05 00:00:51 2014